Modern Chrome Extension Development: Plasmo vs WXT vs Boilerplate (2025 Guide)

Building browser extensions has evolved drastically. Gone are the days of manually syncing manifest.json files and refreshing your browser every time you change a line of CSS. In 2025, modern frameworks have brought the "DX" (Developer Experience) of Next.js or Nuxt to the browser extension ecosystem.

If you are starting a new project, you are likely choosing between three dominant paths: Plasmo, WXT, or a Vite-based Boilerplate. This guide explores which one fits your project best.

---

Quick Comparison Table

Feature	Plasmo	WXT	React + Vite Boilerplate
Philosophy	Battery-packed SDK	Next-gen Framework	Lean Starter Kit
Bundler	Parcel (Default)	Vite	Vite
Framework Support	React (First-class), Vue, Svelte	Agnostic (Vue, React, Svelte, Solid)	React (Fixed)
Manifest Handling	Fully Abstracted	File-based + Inline Config	Manual
HMR (Hot Reload)	Excellent	Industry-leading	Good (UI-focused)
Cross-browser	Chrome, Firefox, Safari	MV2 & MV3 Support (Superior)	Manual adjustment
Best For	Product-focused SaaS teams	Performance & Flexibility geeks	Pure control seekers

---

1. Plasmo: The "Next.js" for Extensions

Plasmo is designed to eliminate the friction of extension development. Its goal is to let you focus on the product rather than the browser's quirky architecture.

Key Advantages:

• Automatic Manifesting: You don't write a manifest.json. By simply creating a file named popup.tsx, Plasmo automatically maps the entry point.
• Built-in APIs: It comes with @plasmohq/storage (handling persistent state across sessions) and @plasmohq/messaging, which are essential for any serious extension.
• Content Scripts UI (CSUI): Injecting React components directly into a webpage's Shadow DOM is notoriously difficult; Plasmo makes it as easy as writing any other component.
• Automated Deployment: Their BPP (Browser Platform Publisher) streamlines the process of submitting to Chrome, Firefox, and Edge stores.

Best for: Developers who want a structured, opinionated environment and don't want to worry about the underlying manifest configurations.

---

2. WXT: The Performance-Centric Powerhouse

WXT (Web Extension Toolkit) is the rising star in the community, leveraging the power of Vite to provide a lightning-fast developer experience.

Key Advantages:

• Framework Agnostic: Whether you prefer the Vue 3 Composition API, Svelte, or even SolidJS, WXT treats them all as first-class citizens.
• Superior HMR: WXT provides incredibly fast hot module replacement, even for Background Service Workers, which are traditionally hard to reload without breaking.
• Auto-imports: Much like Nuxt.js, WXT automatically imports browser APIs and your own utility functions, reducing boilerplate code.
• Cross-Browser Manifesting: WXT makes it trivial to build for both Manifest V2 (Firefox) and Manifest V3 (Chrome) from a single codebase.

Best for: Developers who need maximum flexibility, use frameworks other than React, or prioritize build speed and performance.

---

3. React + Vite Boilerplate: The Minimalist Choice

For those who find frameworks too "magical," the Jonghakseo/chrome-extension-boilerplate-react-vite offers a clean, transparent starting point.

Key Advantages:

• Total Control: There is no hidden abstraction layer. You write the manifest.json yourself, which is helpful if you need to use obscure or bleeding-edge permissions.
• Vite Speed: You still get the benefit of Vite's fast bundling and modern JavaScript features without the overhead of a framework's runtime.
• Low Maintenance: Since it's just a template, you aren't tied to the update cycle of a third-party framework author.

Best for: Small projects, learning the fundamentals of MV3, or when you need bespoke build configurations.

---

FAQ: Making the Right Choice

Q: Which one is better for SEO-focused extensions? A: Both Plasmo and WXT handle assets and HTML structures well. WXT's auto-generation of metadata often feels slightly more modern for SEO best practices.

Q: Does Plasmo support Manifest V2? A: Plasmo is heavily optimized for MV3. If you specifically need to support legacy MV2 for certain Chromium versions, WXT's dual-mode support might be safer.

Q: Can I use Tailwind CSS with these? A: Yes! All three support Tailwind CSS. Both Plasmo and WXT have dedicated documentation for setting it up in seconds.

---

Conclusion

The "right" choice depends on your project's soul:

• If you want a full-suite battery-included experience, go with Plasmo.
• If you want speed, flexiblity, and multi-framework support, choose WXT.
• If you want pure, unadulterated control, clone the Vite Boilerplate.

Ready to build? Start your journey today and stop worrying about manifest.json errors!